If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

In using and managing the means of access, no one may borrow or lend the means of access while receiving any consideration, unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act, or may not deliver the means of access.

On August 3, 2018, the Defendant accepted a proposal that “I will give KRW 3 million to a month when the account was lent because he/she was an exporting company of cosmetics for the purpose of tax saving,” and on August 6, 2018, the Defendant sent the check card connected to the bank account (C) in the name of the Defendant in front of the member-gu in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Seoul, and sent it to the nameless person, and the password of the account was known to D.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay and lent the means of access to electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on financial transaction data;

1. Article 49(4)2 of the relevant Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act regarding criminal facts (i.e., the selection of fines, and the fact that the Defendant’s instant crime was actually abused as a means of deceptioning, however, considering the fact that the Defendant recognized the facts charged and that there was no other penalty power than a single fine, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.