The appeal is dismissed.

2. The following facts are the circumstances favorable to the Defendant: (a) the Defendant, who made a confession from the investigative agency to the crime of this case; (b) appears to have not actively demanded a bribe to the bribe payer; (c) was employed to the Farmland Improvement Association on January 1, 1981; and (d) served relatively in good faith as a quasi-public official before the instant crime was committed; and (d) there is only the history of being punished by a minor fine on one occasion prior to 20

However, the crime of this case is the receipt of KRW 15,00,00 under the pretext of honorariums for the fact that the defendant ordered the project to repair facilities in the Changdong District under a free contract for the repair project of the Korea Rural Community Corporation, in which the defendant was in office from the Korea Rural Community Corporation E, and the defendant received KRW 15,00,00 from the Korea Rural Community Corporation. The crime of this case is not proper in light of the fact that the amount ordered by the public agencies increases the unnecessary amount of the construction cost and damages the social trust in the fairness of the execution of public duties, and thereby the social harm and injury is serious, and the crime is not proper in light of the amount of the accepted money, and there is a significant amount of crime, and the scope of the recommended sentence for the crime of this case according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court's sentencing guidelines established by the Korea Rural Community Corporation shall be limited to 1 to 3 years of imprisonment, 2 years of bribery, 300,000,000,0000,000.