2. The judgment of the defendant reflects the defendant's mistake in depth while recognizing the crime of this case and agreed with the victim at an investigative agency only, but the defendant committed the crime of this case at once again during the period of repeated crime of the same kind, although he had the record of punishment such as punishment for the same crime, the crime of this case is committed again during the period of repeated crime of the same crime. The crime of this case is a theft of high-class vehicle parked in the parking lot after the defendant collected the crime together with the accomplice C, and prepared the criminal implements in advance, and the character and circumstances of the crime are bad, and other various circumstances, which are conditions for the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., are considered to be too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.