A. The Defendant did not have any misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles that did not wish the victim, and even if she took a bath, she did not feel fear, and merely committed assault against the victim due to the newspaper that was cited to avoid the victim’s religious ties.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the court below's legitimately adopted and examined the argument of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles, namely, ① the victim made a consistent and concrete statement to the investigation agency and the court of the court below that "it was made within the ELbeer," and "it was made in favor of the defendant," and that "it was made in favor of the defendant," and the defendant continued to take a bath about why she took a bath, and she took a look at the door," and the above statement was credibility in light of the following circumstances. ② The defendant also made a statement in the investigation agency that "the defendant was flick about only one question that she was flick," ③ The passenger who observed the instant case was flick, and the passenger was flick to the woman who appears to be male as flicker at the end of the 60th century, and was flick with the desire of "hy," and the victim did not appear to be flick with the male desire and his behavior.

(4) The Defendant continued to mislead the victim while being investigated by the Korean Railroad Police Officers at the I Office;

In light of the fact that the defendant took a bath for the "Jathere" due to the absence of the head of the bate, etc., the defendant fears the railroad worker who is the victim as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below.