beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2012.09.25 2012고단360

사기

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, around May 201, at the construction site of the multi-family house owned by the victim E in Ansan-si, which was newly constructed to operate a leasing business, installed the victim in the multi-family house. The Defendants, “If the heating pumps for heating and cooling sold by our company are installed in the multi-family house, the head office of the Korean power, the head office of the Korea Electric Power Branch, the employees in charge, and the employees in charge, are already talked, so the Defendant is able to use the “general electricity” with much much less electricity prices than those of the “house” subject to the progressive system, and even if the heating and cooling system is operated in Korea, there are still a lot of electricity prices per household and more than KRW 1 to 20,000,000 per day, and the heating and cooling effect of the two multi-family houses located in Ansan-si, which have already been installed in the apartment house in 200, which has already been installed in our company, and thus, the Defendant had the above 20-family loan business operator to the effect that 20.

7.8.In the name of intermediate payments, 22,440,000 won has been remitted.

However, in fact, F Co., Ltd., a company with which the Defendants are working, did not have the intent or ability to be supplied with the “general electricity” that is much much much higher than the “electric electricity” compared to the “electric electricity to be applied even if the victims purchased and install the said pumps in the said multi-family house, such as that there was no outcome of installing the said pumps in the 2nd unit of the multi-family house located in the inner bridge, and that there was no intention or ability to be supplied with the said “general electricity” in comparison with the “electric electricity to be applied” to the said multi-family house.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim, thereby leading the victim.