2. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) is about 14,407.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 17, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a selective sales agency contract with the Defendant with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant contract”) under the following conditions.

1) Agency name: Dagency name 2) Contract period: The scope of entrusted duties: (a) payment of fees to be paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff within his/her jurisdiction, such as collection and delivery of elective cargo, and (b) payment of fees to the Plaintiff; (b) the Plaintiff ends each month; and (c) the Defendant shall issue a tax invoice to the Defendant by the tenth day of the following month; and (d) the Defendant immediately review it and transfer it to the old account designated by the Plaintiff by the 25th day of the following month, if there is no objection thereto.

(3) The collection fees: 8% below the unit price, less than 1,500 won, less than 1,60 won, less than 1,500 won, less than 9% below 1,60 won, less than 1,700 won, less than 1,500 won, less than 1,700 won, and less than 11% below the unit price. (4) In the case of delivery fees, the delivery fees shall be unpaid less than 2,00 won, less than 2,400 won, less than 100 won but not less than 2,40 won, not less than 2,400 won, and not less than 2,400 won, and not less than 2,400 won shall be deducted from the general fees (minimum 400 won/stuffs guarantee), and other matters not prescribed in this Agreement shall be governed by the terms and conditions of the attached agency contracts, work manuals and other attached documents, etc.

B. Until February 5, 2018, the Plaintiff performed entrusted duties and unpaid fees under the instant contract.

The Plaintiff issued a monthly tax invoice and claimed fees to the Defendant, and the Defendant paid the full amount of the amount stated in the tax invoice issued by the Plaintiff up to December 2017, but the due date for payment after the Plaintiff ceased to perform the entrusted duties. < Amended by Act No. 15083, Jan.