However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 15, 2017, the Defendant reported 112 that he was frighting on the road in front of the “C” located in the Sinju City B on August 16:57, 2017, and reported 112, and sent out by the Defendant E, the police officer belonging to the D police unit of the Sinju Police Station D, and whether the Defendant interfered with the duties of employees of convenience stores and f,

Along with the words "I am home, because I would be subject to punishment for a continuing failure, I am home," and assault the above F at one time at the right face side of the F. The words "I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am."

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning 112 reporting duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (the details of the instant crime, the degree of damage by police officers, the fact that the Defendant is receiving hospitalized treatment due to respect for alcohol at present, there is no history of punishment exceeding a fine after 193, the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, etc.);