However, the execution of the above punishment for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. From August 23, 2013, Defendant A: (a) around 18:00 on August 23, 2013, Defendant A: (b) placed the victim G (or 55 years of age) and the victim’s right hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand and hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand on the left left hand to the victim, and caused damage to the fats requiring approximately four weeks of medical treatment from the date of surgery and surgery.

2. Defendant B received the Defendant’s head’s face from around 09:30 on November 8, 2013, 2013, following the issue of taking over the fat of the fat in the fat of A and the victim H (the age of 49). As to the issue of taking over the fat of the fat of the fat, A and fat of the fat of the Defendant’s fat of the fat of the fat of the fat of the Defendant’s fat of the fat of the fat of the fat of the fat of the Defendant

As a result, the Defendant was an internal franchisium, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment to H.

Summary of Evidence

【Defendant A-Defendant A】

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. The entry of witnesses G and I in the third protocol of trial;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning G;

1. Each police statement made to G and I;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter 【2013 Highest 3086 fact-Defendant B】

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement made by A in the seventh trial records, and by H in the eighth trial records;

1. The police suspect interrogation protocol of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Defendant A of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution: The injury of the Victim G was caused by the Defendant’s knife and fighting the Victim’s hand with his body, and the victim was injured on the part of his body who undergone the operation five months prior to the operation, and was based on the conclusive intention of the injury;

Defendant B: Taking account of the fact that it is difficult to see it as an injury due to the Defendant’s act or the fact that it appears as an contingent crime committed by each other.