1. Obstruction of business;

A. On July 2016, the Defendant found that around July 2016, 2016, the Defendant had been drinking alcohol in the Embrymna of the victim D’s operation, which was in his/her place, around July 2016, to the victim and his/her customers “I want to sleep.”

In order to prevent customers from entering the beauty room by avoiding the disturbance, such as a large sound, etc., it was impossible to enter the beauty room.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the beauty room business of the victim by force.

B. On October 29, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime from around 22:30 on October 29, 2016 to 23:13 on the same day, entered a victim H restaurant operated by the victim G in the Nam-gun F in South-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City from around 22:30 on October 29, 2016, and obstructed another person’s access before the entrance, and obstructed another person’s access, and upon receiving a demand to request the victim from the damaged person, “each of them is h, h, h, h, h;

D. D. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.D.

It was impossible for customers to enter the restaurant by avoiding the disturbance, such as the so-called “nick sound,” to enter the restaurant.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

(c)

On October 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 02:00 on October 30, 2016, 2016: (b) went to the Jart in the operation of the Victim I, which had a large amount of alcohol to the victims and customers; (c) and (d) made it impossible for the Defendant to enter the Mart by having the customers, who were able to take a bath to the victims and customers and to take a large sound.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victimized person by force.

(d)

On November 13, 2016, the Defendant entered into the restaurant with a large volume of alcohol around 13:12 on November 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered into the restaurant with the victim’s M of L in Yong-gun, Nam-gun, Namnam-gun, with a large voice, “this house bed bedb is mebed, meb meb,” thereby making it impossible for the Defendant to enter the restaurant and enter the restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant has a power to conduct the restaurant business of the victim.