The punishment of the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant divided his mistake into each other; (b) the damaged goods were returned to the victim; (c) the Defendant was a favorable sentencing factor or multiple criminal records including the same criminal records; and (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the repeated offense period; and (b) the scope of the recommended sentencing according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee (type 4 of larceny for general property: imprisonment of 8 months to 1 year and 6 months); and (c) the Defendant’s argument is not recognized to be unreasonable because the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, on the grounds that the Defendant’s argument is not reasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.