If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant in the trade name of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B, 101 Dong 122 and 123.

A general restaurant business operator among food entertainment business operators shall not employ entertainment entertainment workers to have them provide entertainment services or encourage or impliedly encourage employees to do such acts.

Nevertheless, at around October 24, 2017, the Defendant violated the code of practice of food entertainment business operators by allowing D, an employee, to drink together with male customers with his/her nameless male customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against D or E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing enforcement photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the relevant Act on criminal facts and subparagraph 6 of Article 97 of the Food Sanitation Act, and Article 44 (1) 8 (Selection of Penalty Surcharge) of the same Act on the selective criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act takes into account the favorable circumstances that the defendant committed the instant crime into consideration in light of the fact that he/she committed the instant crime, and considering the fact that he/she again committed the instant crime even though he/she had the record of punishment for the same kind of crime, unfavorable circumstances should be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account the defendant’s age, sex, family relationship, environment, circumstance and result of the instant crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc.