When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 11, 2016, the Defendant damaged KRW 20,000 of the repair cost by inserting the gate lines in the key hole of the guard room room knife, which is an object jointly owned by the occupant of the said officetel, by placing them in the key hole of the guard room knife, which is an object owned by the said officetel, to prevent the use of the above entrance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. On-site photographs [Notwithstanding the evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the Defendant, according to the above evidence, concluded a security room agreement with the representative qualification for the management of officetels, and did not complete the registration of ownership transfer as to the security room building. Thus, the above security room cannot be deemed as owned by the Defendant’s individual] statutory application.

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;