If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On July 26, 2012, around 21:30 on July 26, 2012, the Defendant sent a complaint to the Defendant who was arrested as a flagrant offender in the case of insultd around D at approximately four hours in front of the police box located in C, which was located in D, and found the police box. However, the Defendant did not look at the police officer who was arrested him. While four police officers working in the police box and the residents working in the police box are viewed to have been in a simple clerical error, the Defendant sent F to F to correct it by stating, “The Defendant was taken with the wrong mind that the Defendant was found to have done so, f.e., f., bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch f.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 57 of the Criminal Act including days of pre-trial detention;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.