beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.05.17 2016고정106

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 13, 2015, the Defendant driving a CST5 car as its duty, and sent the 20-day three distance in front of the instant apartment, the head of the front city in the front city of the front city in the front city of the front city of the front city, the head of the front city in the front city of the two-lanes to the head of the Home plug, the speed of about 10km in the speed of about 3-lanes between the three-lanes.

Since the place has only three-dimensional signal apparatus and there is no left-hand turn sign, there was a duty of care to make no left- or left-hand turn turn.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and took part in the front part of the Defendant’s car driving seat of the victim D (the 55-year-old) driving, who was placed in parallel with the home fluor from the direction of the right-hand fluor to the home fluor on the side of the right-hand fluor, the Defendant violated the signal and met at the three-lane fluor of the straight line, and was in the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle driving seat.

Thus, the Defendant suffered injury, such as tensions and tensions, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim D due to such occupational negligence, on the part of the victim F ( South and North, 16 years of age), the victim F ( South and North, 16 years of age), the same G ( South and North, 16 years of age), and the same H ( South and 17 years of age), respectively, for about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of G, F, H, and D;

1. A traffic accident report, an accident scene and vehicle photographs, and a photograph of a damaged taxi boom;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;