아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On September 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 18:33 on September 11, 2014, 2014, the Defendant: (b) considered the victim D (the age of 15) to receive money from his/her her son; (c) asked the victim that “one is able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to receive money from her son; and (d) asked the victim that “one is able to be able to be able to be able to receive money from her son;
2. The Defendant and his defense counsel did not commit any indecent act by force against the victim as stated in the facts charged, and there is no difference between the victim and the victim on the day of the instant case.
3. Determination
A. As evidence corresponding to the facts charged, there are statements made by the police of the victim and the court in this court, ctv-down photographs, etc.
B. As to the credibility of the victim’s statement, it is difficult to confirm whether the suspect alone presents a witness and a witness or only one photograph of the suspect in the criminal identification procedure based on the appearance, etc. of the suspect in the first related legal doctrine because the limits of human memory and the possibility that the suspect or a person on his/her photograph may give him/her anless cancer that the suspect or the person on his/her photograph is suspected of being a criminal under the influence of identity and in detail, there is another circumstance that the witness’s statement in the criminal identification procedure by such a method may be suspected of being a criminal suspect.
Unless there are any additional circumstances, such as whether it is done or not, it shall be deemed that the credibility thereof is low.
In addition, when it is possible to evaluate that a witness's statement in the criminal identification process is highly reliable, the witness's statement or description is recorded in advance in detail, including the suspect.