A. The facts revealed that the victim had not been tried in the detention state due to the crime of special robbery, rape, confinement, assault, larceny, and robbery in the Suwon District Court. The victim was tried by the same person under the same name as the victim, but on September 14, 2009, at the Suwon District Court, around September 14, 2009, when the victim was tried by the same person, the victim’s reputation of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts to the above G, the name of Non-Indicted Party F, the main director of which was the above court’s bulletin board, while confirming the trial time attached to the court’s bulletin board, and Non-Indicted Party F, the name of whom was the same person, was the victim, was stated as being tried under the detention of the case of special robbery.

B. The facts are as follows: (a) although the same name with the victim was detained and the victim was well aware of the fact that it was tried due to the crime of special robbery, rape, etc.; (b) despite the fact that the victim was not tried, the Defense Acquisition Program Administration has intentionally known the fact that the victim had been tried due to the crime of special robbery, rape, etc.; (c) made it impossible to deliver it to the Defense Acquisition Program Administration by misunderstanding the image of the D (State) operated by the victim by intentionally knowing the fact that the victim was tried; and (d) on September 10, 2009, at the office of Yong-nam in the Republic of Korea where the victim had the same name and the same name had the same been tried