However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at D’s main points located in Busan Shodong-gu C around 19:00 on December 18, 2016, the Defendant: (b) filed a report by the Defendant’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her she claimed to her her her her her her her her her her her her her her she was arrested by committing assault against the Defendant’

In doing the bath theory as “,” the breath was scambling with G by hand, and the arms was debrised.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of statutes on police statements made to H and G;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act refers to the case where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor (one month to eight months), the mitigation area (one month to eight months), and the case where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor (the decision of sentencing] is contrary to the decision of sentence, and all kinds of sentencing conditions such as the records of the same kind of crime