2. Although there are favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant was in a trial and recognized all the facts charged of this case, the fact that the defendant's economic situation is not good, part of the thief damage was returned to the victims, and that some victims do not want the punishment of the defendant, the defendant who committed the crime of this case in this case without being aware of considerable number of times of criminal punishment due to the same thief crime, 8 times of punishment for the crime of larceny and 2 times of suspended sentence, and there is no special change of circumstances that could change the sentence of the court below after the sentence of the court below was sentenced, and considering all the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relations, etc., it is not recognized that the punishment of the court below is unfair because it is too too large. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.