However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 15, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 01:00 on March 15, 2020, on the “D operated by the Defendant’s wife C (n, 48 years of age) (hereinafter “C”); (b) on the grounds that the wife refused to meet, the Defendant: (c) on the ground that the Defendant was released from the phone to the wife under the influence of alcohol; (d) on the ground that the wife refused to meet, but (e) on the ground that the Defendant was released from the entrance, and caused damage to the Defendant’s repair cost amounting to KRW 10,000,000 of the repair cost.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the entrance door of the victim's glass.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A written estimate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (including the fact that the defendant has agreed smoothly with the victim, the degree of damage (one hundred thousand won for repair) is not significant);