around 04:00 on October 19, 2012, the Defendant sold 2 soldiers, who are harmful substances to juveniles, without verifying the age to E (n, 17 years of age) and F (15 years of age, at “D restaurant” operated by the Defendant in Dacheon-si C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the witness E and F’s statutory statement Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. In the indictment, the pertinent legal provisions and Articles 59 subparag. 6 and 28(1) of the Juvenile Protection Act regarding criminal facts and the selective sentencing of punishment are erroneously stated in the indictment as “Article 58 subparag. 3 and Article 28(1) of the Juvenile Protection Act” (Article 58 subparag. 3 and Article 28(1) of the same Act (Article 28(1) of the same Act). However, given that there is no substantial disadvantage to the defense of the accused,

(1) A fine of 300,000 won to be imposed on April 28, 2006 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Do4085, Apr. 28, 2006)

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) appears to be due to the fact that the defendant denies his criminal facts, but is likely to lead a living due to the suspension of business, and the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of force once while operating