On June 26, 2019, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “B shall use his/her mobile phone at the events located in the Central Roon-dong, Gangwon-si, Gangwon-do, and then sell Aphone 80,000 won.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have 8 opphones at the time, and there was no intention or ability to deliver 8 opphones even if opphones were paid 8 sales proceeds because opphones were received from opphone8 sales proceeds and used opphones for living expenses, and opphones were not sent.

Nevertheless, on June 26, 2019, the Defendant received KRW 290,000 from the post office account (Account Number: D) in the name of the Defendant from the victim C who reported and contacted the above writing, and acquired the same amount by fraud.

The Defendant came to know of the Victim E in 2012 at the Minor Manpower Office in 2012.

1. On August 13, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the G agency located in F in Gangwon-si, Gangwon-si, that “The Defendant would pay the victim the face value directly by opening a mobile phone in four names because he/she cannot open a mobile phone with a bad credit transaction.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have fixed income at the time and bears a large number of obligations, and even if he opens a mobile phone, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the fee.

The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) using one cell phone from the victim of the damage; and (c) not paying approximately KRW 1 million of the usage fee; and (d) acquired a considerable amount of proprietary benefits.

2. On August 15, 2012, the Defendant ought to pay the victim’s accommodation expenses at H market at the Won-si, Seoul Special Self-Governing Province.

The term "a loan of KRW 240,000 won is changed from the loan of money."

However, in fact, the defendant has no fixed income at the time and bears a large number of obligations, and such money is borrowed.