On October 2016, the Defendant reported a daily employment report stating the victim's resident registration number to the high-class branch office of the Central Labor Agency of the Central Labor Agency of the Central Labor Agency of the Central Labor Agency of the Central Labor Agency of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central Government of the Central

2. In addition to punishing “a person who unlawfully uses another person’s resident registration certificate” under Article 37 subparag. 8 of the Act on Resident Registration, in light of the purport of punishing “a person who unlawfully uses another person’s resident registration number” under Article 37 subparag. 10 of the same Act, “a person who unlawfully uses another person’s resident registration number” under Article 17 subparag. 10 of the same Act, the meaning and amendment history of the content of Article 10 of the same Act, and the general principle of statutoryism prohibiting the expanded interpretation of penal laws and regulations, etc., Article 37 subparag. 10 of the Act on Resident Registration does not present a type of identification document stating a person’s resident registration number, such as his/her name and resident registration number, as his/her driver’s license, in the process of verifying the identity or identifying his/her resident registration number with only the name and resident registration number, etc., or using it for the purpose of punishing that person’s resident registration number without permission. Thus, even if one uses another person’s resident registration number without permission, it does not constitute a specific offense of 10.