However, for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the above sentence shall be executed.

1. Defendant B: (a) around 16:30 on February 27, 2018, the Defendant: (b) cut off the cash of KRW 300,000,000, which is the victim C, and was placed in the order, into E located in Chungcheongnam-gun budget group; and (c) committed a theft.

2. On February 27, 2018, at around 20:0, the Defendant: (a) in G located in the F of the Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group, the Victim B took away his own money, such as paragraph (1) and prevented H from assaulting the victim with a dangerous object by causing approximately 10 times of approximately 10 minutes of the victim’s bucks, bucks, etc.

3. At around 13:00 on February 28, 2018, Defendant A assaulted the victim H (32 years of age) at the Defendant’s house located in Chungcheongnam-gun budget group I using a knife knife ( approximately 30cm in length, approximately 18cm in knife length) located in the knife, which is a dangerous object, on the ground that the victim was at the time of his own her own son B, on the grounds that the victim was at the Defendant’s house located in knife of the knife, the Defendant threatened the victim with the knife, with the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

Summary of Evidence

【Criminal Facts of Paragraph 1 at the Time of Sales】

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The police suspect interrogation protocol of H;

1. Examination protocol of suspect C by the prosecution [the crime of paragraph (2) at the time of display]

1. A suspect interrogation protocol concerning B by the prosecution;

1. Statement made to A by the police officer [the crime of paragraph (3) at the time of sale];

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A suspect interrogation protocol concerning B by the prosecution;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Determination on the assertion of Defendant C and defense counsel in the police seizure protocol

1. The summary of the argument is that H was used for the larceny crime as stated in Paragraph 1 of the judgment of the court below, and H merely stated that “h is aware that he was faced with B, and he will use B only if he was b,” and that H did not call that “h is able to use it as each item of Section B.”

2...