1. On February 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) accessed Kakao Stockholm Stockholm, an information and communications network (an information and communications network) to which 162 members of the instant association were admitted using smartphones, around 16:55, around February 9, 2017, the Defendant committed the instant association; (b) was requested by the instant association to return relocation expenses from January 20, 2017; and (c) was not subject to administrative litigation against the instant association on August 24, 2016, even if the Defendant had filed an administrative litigation against the instant association, for the purpose of slandering the victim, “A member who received the relocation expenses must receive relocation expenses as requested for deposit from the association.”

I, as follows:

The partnership has no choice but to appoint a lawyer in a lawsuit which does not end.

Mabbababa bababa bbababba babba

The phrase “,” posted a false statement to the public, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

2. On February 10, 2017, the Defendant, using smartphones around 16:16, on February 10, 2017, connected to “I”, an information and communications network in which 277 members of the instant association were affiliated with “I” by using smartphones in Seoul (hereinafter referred to as Seoul) around 16:16, and the victim does not file an administrative lawsuit against the instant association after receiving a request for the return of relocation expenses from the instant association on January 20, 2017, and did not file an administrative lawsuit against the instant association on August 24, 2016. However, even if the Defendant had filed an administrative lawsuit against the instant association on August 24, 2016, the Defendant required to deposit the funds from the association for the purpose of slandering the victim with “the minimum number of members related to the receipt of relocation expenses in excess of the percentage.”