A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.

However, as to Defendant B, the same shall apply.

Defendant

A was entrusted by the parent of the victim D (E) from around 2004 to September 25, 2013, and was in a relationship of fostering and protecting the victim. Defendant B is the parent of Defendant A.

1. Defendant A committed physical abuse against the victim by putting the victim’s hand in water on the 4th floor of the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Central Government Building in 2012, on the ground that the victim (the age of 8 at that time) f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. c. c. c. c. c. f. c. c. c. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. 8)

2. The Defendant B, at the same place as the Defendant’s influence No. 1 on the date of influence in 2012, did not take food for the said victim (the age of eight at that time) out of place.

On the ground of drinking water, the victim received hot water from water purifiers, thereby causing bodily abuse to the victim, such as the number of days of treatment by causing the victim to suffer from an influence, such as an influence video, etc.

3. The Defendants conspired to commit the joint crime at around September 25, 2013 at the same place as: (a) around September 25, 2013; (b) together with the said victim’s damages (the said victim’s damages at the age of nine (the said nine) as the pressure roof; and (c) put the victim into the warehouse; (d) found that the victim’s pressure shelf had a rate of interest; and (e) the Defendants found the victim’s damages together with the pressure shelf; and (e) detained the victim into the warehouse after putting the victim into custody.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and G;

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. A summary of the case of specialized child protection agencies in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City;

1. A report on a fall accident;

1. The Defendant’s photograph before and after video treatment [the Defendants denied the charges, but according to the aforementioned evidence, the Defendants’ victim, who is a child entrusted as stated in the facts charged, physically and mentally.