However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 15:00 on October 13, 2018, the defendant stated that "C" in front of the entrance route in the Namnam-gun, the victim D (the age of 68) sold the excavation and "a person who wants to have stolen the victim's her son's her son would refuse to sell her her her fry." The defendant her her son her her son her her son her son her her son her son her her son her her son her son her her son her son her her son her her face, and then her her her her son her her son her her son her her face after her her her hand her her her her son her her son her face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Protocol of the witness examination of witness E, and protocol of the police statement of E;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel stated in the judgment, "the defendant was not able to see the victim's clothes to take place in his/her hands after putting the victim's head debt, putting him/her fright, and her face, as stated in the judgment. At the time, the defendant stated that he/she would display a knife a knife of the victim's body knife the victim's body knife the knife with the victim's body knife the knife with the victim's hand knife the defendant's body knife the defendant's body knife and knife the defendant's body knife the defendant's body knife with the defendant's body knife with the defendant's body knife. The defendant asserted that the defendant's knife will well knife the defendant's body knife."

However, the victim is consistently stated in this court that he was assaulted by the defendant, as stated in its reasoning, and E, a witness, also the police and this.