When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a bus in fishing to C New Schlage owned by Heung Transportation.

On September 18, 2015, the Defendant driven the above bus around 13:20 on September 18, 2015, and continued to proceed with the notice of transportation vehicle for interest in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

In this case, the defendant, who is engaged in driving, has a duty of care to take into account the traffic situation on the right side and the right side, and to accurately operate and safely drive the steering system and brakes of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and proceeded with the victim D (the age of 73) who was boomed in front of the left side of the bus in front of it and without finding out the victim who exceeded the floor due to its shock, and the victim's down at the top of the left side of the bus in front of the bus.

After all, around September 18, 2015, the Defendant caused the death of the said victim at the Indones Hospital located in the Incheon Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, due to the diversification of the said victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on traffic history (1) (2) (2)

1. A death diagnosis report or postmortem report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs at each accident site;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the victim died.

In addition, one defendant has the same criminal history.

However, it is more favorable to the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and against himself, the defendant's bus was subscribed to the bus mutual aid association, and the defendant did not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with his bereaved family members.