방실침입
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Criminal facts
The defendant was aware of the victim D(n, 26 years old) and 'E' of the victim D(n, 26 years old) and 'E' as her business female, and decided to have sexual intercourse with the victim and the mother.
On the other hand, the Defendant, on January 11, 2018, 19:20 around 19:20, 504 of “Gel” in Daegu Jung-gu F, Daegu-gu, divided the Defendant’s talks with H, a woman of lebling who became aware of the said fishing method, and the Defendant, upon arrival of the victim, came out of the room.
After that, the Defendant: (a) deemed that the victimized person was a levir female who had a conversation with him/her; and (b) tried to engage in a sexual intercourse, the Defendant did not have any duty to leave the levir, but did not have any duty to leave the levir, and (c) infringed on the victim’s room using approximately one hour and seven-minutes of a sexual intercourse with the levir in the above levirative room in a manner that the damaged person entered the clothes room in the above levir.
Summary of Evidence
1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;
1. Each police statement made with H and D;
1. Each investigation report (the details of answers to written questions with the victim H), and (the documents submitted to the victim D);
1. A fire-proof report (the attachment and attachment of the 112 Case Processing Table) (the crime of intrusion by fire-proof by omission is established, and the following items, which are acknowledged by omission, are established when comprehensively taking into account evidence, the crime of intrusion by fire-proof by omission is established:
(1) The victim has been in a room to engage in a sexual intercourse with H, and the victim also has a right to privacy against the telecom.
② The victim tried to have sexual intercourse with the Defendant initially known as a female, and had already known H as the counter-party Defendant, but, if the victim knew that he was the Defendant, not H, or had no intention to engage in an excessive sexual intercourse on the other male place (the Defendant was the victim himself as a female, but the Defendant was the male.