When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 3, 2016, the Defendant, at around 15:52, posted a letter containing the contents of slandering the Defendant at the D office located in Busan Northernbuk-gu, through “the Kakakao Museum stud” in the smartphone c. B. The Defendant, as if he had previously disclosed the victim’s unknown identity, etc., which was known to the victim before, would have the victim deleted the article by making it public.

one time, the relevant visible

The distance from the community to the community shall be anywhere in the subjects.

Along with par value per se, sees

A man’s standard is a man’s Kakao Stockholm conversation with the head of the Party. A man’s standard is a man’s dial-a-a-the-art figure, and sent a text message “the thickness that would be fasted once a year,” which would have caused the occurrence of the crime,” and, from that time, sent it to October 30, 2016, 14 times in total, as indicated in the list of crimes in the separate sheet of crimes, using text messages or a Kakakao Kakao studios, etc., to disclose the victim’s insane, etc., and caused harm and injury.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened each victim respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's argument about 16 copies of human dialogue between the defendant and the defendant and his defense counsel are sent a text message, etc. as described in the judgment in order to respond to the defendant's behavior, such as sending a text message containing the victim's abusive language to the defendant, and the victim did not take a brupt, such as deletion of a sign containing the contents that slander the defendant even after receiving the above text messages, so the defendant's act does not constitute intimidation, and the defendant's act is not a legitimate defense or legitimate act.