1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to Defendant A’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the lower court was guilty of all of the charges of this case against the Defendant, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning, of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (excluding the part of acquittal in the grounds of appeal). In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower

In addition, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a minor sentence has been imposed on the above defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the sentence is unreasonable

2. According to Article 383 subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act with respect to Defendant C’s grounds of appeal, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without labor for more than ten years has been imposed. As such, in this case where the said Defendant was sentenced to a minor sentence, the allegation that the sentencing of the sentence

3. All appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.