When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 9, 2014, the Defendant driven a C Carrens car and continued to run the C Carren as one-lane of the two-lanes of the new filial road at Seopo-si, Seopopo-si, Seopopo-si.

A person engaging in driving service of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure the necessary distance to avoid a collision with the motor vehicle ahead of it when the vehicle ahead of it stops suddenly and to change course when it intends to change course, and to operate the direction, etc. of the change, and to check whether there is a vehicle driving along the lane, and to prevent the accident in advance by driving it in a manner that does not impede the normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction of the change.

Nevertheless, in order to avoid the collision with the vehicle ahead without securing the safety distance with the vehicle ahead, the defendant neglected this and caused the vehicle ahead of it to fall down next to it by keeping the direction to the right side in order to avoid the collision with the vehicle ahead of it by occupational negligence and by changing the course from the first to the second two-lanes of the vehicle ahead of it.

After all, the Defendant destroyed the above low-speed car owned by the victim Doren-cher, Co., Ltd., Ltd., which was driven by D due to the above occupational negligence, in a way that the amount equivalent to KRW 18,823,120 is equivalent to the repair cost, respectively, and the amount equivalent to KRW 1,254,070 is equivalent to the repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of traffic accident reports, copies of each medical certificate, estimates, each photograph, and video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions for criminal facts: Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act; and

1. Formal concurrence and the choice of punishment: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. A workhouse;