여신전문금융업법위반등
All the judgment below is reversed.
Defendant
A Punishment of 1 year and fine of 20,000,000 for crimes Nos. 1 and 4 of its holding;
1. The sentence imposed in the original judgment on the summary of the grounds for appeal (for Defendant A, KRW 1.6 months and fines of KRW 20 million, fines of KRW 7 million, confiscation, and fines of KRW 20 million for each of the two years and fines of KRW 20 million for Defendant B and C, and for Defendant E, KRW 1.6 months and fines of KRW 20 million, and confiscation) are too unreasonable.
2. The so-called "open-end" crime is a criminal whose social harm to disrupt the order of credit card trading by lending cash by using a credit card, the amount of financing out of the 16.9 billion won in total is very large, Defendant A and C, between about one year in the case of Defendant A and C, about two years and two months in the case of Defendant E, and about one year and two months in the case of Defendant E, repeated crimes among the above amount, 6.2 billion won in the case of Defendant A and C, 16.2 billion won in the case of Defendant E, and 10.7 billion won in the case of Defendant E, the Defendants reported the above violation of the Act on the Punishment of Tax Evaders in order to avoid payment by the credit card company and monitoring of the e-commerce brokerage service provider, and reported the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Tax Evaders in addition to the above violation of the Act on the Punishment of Tax Evaders, and paid the remaining amount of money out of the name of Defendant A and the 1.3 billion won in the case of the above violation of the Act.