A. The six-month imprisonment sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. As to the assertion of unfair sentencing by the Defendant and the prosecutor together with regard to each of the allegation of unfair sentencing by the Defendant and the prosecutor, the Defendant recognized all of the facts charged in the instant case and reflects his mistake, the degree of injury caused by the instant crime is not much serious, and considering the favorable circumstances such as the content of the instant crime and the frequency of the crimes, the criminal liability for the instant crime is not easy; the Defendant committed again the instant crime during the repeated crime period due to the same crime; the Defendant did not receive a letter from the victims or take specific measures for recovery from damage; the Defendant appears to have not good health; the Defendant’s sentence due to the crime related to violence, two times, two times, and four times, and other unfavorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the Defendant and the prosecutor’s assertion that the Defendant and the prosecutor are too heavy or unreasonable, and thus, are not justified.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.