2. It is recognized that the Defendant appears to have recognized and reflected all of his criminal acts.

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, including the fact that the defendant has been punished twice for the same crime, the value of the waste vinyl acquired, the fact that the defendant did not enter into an agreement with the victim or has not recovered from damage, and the defendant's age, sex, family environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it is difficult to view the judgment of the court below as unfair because the sentencing of the defendant is too excessive and it is difficult to view that the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.