Of the defendants B, the part of the defendant is reversed.

Defendant

B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and two months.

Defendant

B. ..

A. Defendant A1’s misunderstanding of fact (hereinafter “Defendant A1”) regarding acceptance of bribe around 2012, the amount of KRW 2 million transferred to Defendant A under the name of the head of the Tong was received as the principal repayment, and the amount of KRW 1 million was received before Defendant A received as the repayment for the amount lent to Defendant B, and the amount of KRW 3,000,000 as the repayment for the money borrowed by Defendant A prior to the date indicated in the facts charged does not receive KRW 5,00,000 for the purpose of resolving the

② With respect to the acceptance of bribe around 2013, Defendant A did not receive two million won, as stated in the facts charged, from Defendant B.

③ As to the acceptance of bribe around 2015, Defendant A merely borrowed KRW 10 million from Defendant B, but does not accept a bribe in relation to the solicitation of change in the name of the F owner.

2) Improper sentencing of the lower court (a year of imprisonment and a fine of KRW 20 million) is too unreasonable.

B. As to Defendant B1’s mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, ① issuance of bribe around 2012, the money that Defendant B delivered to Defendant A is not the money paid under the pretext of civil petition resolution.

Some of the money (30 million won) is paid as a principal repayment.

② As to the delivery of a bribe in around 2013, Defendant B did not provide Defendant A with two million won as stated in the facts charged.

③ As to the delivery of a bribe in around September 2015, the application for change of the F owner’s name was already returned on September 1, 2015, Defendant B had no motive to deliver a bribe to Defendant A for change of the owner’s name.

Permission to change the name of the owner shall not be considered as a bribe because it is not related to the duties of Defendant A who is a cause of the D Council.

④ As to the event of the above investigation document and attempted fraud, Defendant B did not deliver to the attorney’s office a forged written agreement.

Defendant

Since the issue of settlement related to the construction of F remains between B and K, the change in the name of the owner that Defendant B raised by the K side.