beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.02 2016고정810

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-learning car.

On August 13, 2015, at around 11:45, the Defendant operated the foregoing vehicle without a driver's license, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, and led the front road of Gangnam-gu Seoul to proceed with the front road of Gangnam-gu Seoul to the intersection of the intersection distance from the side of the car hospital shooting distance.

At the time, the Defendant had the duty of care to secure and proceed with the safety distance that would be avoided when the Defendant was well able to live in the same situation and stopped the damaged vehicles, as the victim D(61) driver was behind the same direction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive the damaged vehicle in the vicinity of the vehicle due to the negligence of driving the vehicle in the vicinity of the vehicle, which was parked in the atmosphere of the mast signal, led the vehicle in front of the Defendant, and due to the shock, led the damaged vehicle in front of the Defendant, leading the victim F (the age of 65) to the behind of the G rocketing taxi of the victim F (the age of 65).

Ultimately, the Defendant, through occupational negligence as seen above, inflicted injury on the victim D on the “finites and tensions” requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, inflicted on the victim F such as the “finites and tensions,” which requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim F, and inflicted on the victim H (the victim, the victim, the passenger of the damaged vehicle, the victim, the victim of the victim, the victim, the victim of the victim, the victim of the victim, the victim, who is the victim of approximately two weeks of treatment. At the same time, the Defendant damaged the victim’s cargo car repair cost of KRW 1,267,510 and the victim’s 1,717,750 for the repair cost of the taxi and the victim’s F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident (A, D, F);

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Mandatory insurance data;

1. Photographs of the skin vehicle, and photograph of the damaged vehicle;

1. Written estimate for repair;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;