Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

On December 7, 2014, at around 18:20, the Defendant assaulted parking managers in front of the “C” restaurant parking lot located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and received reports, and respondeded to the statement that the slope E affiliated with the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Police Station D commander of the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Police Station would not be punished for the Defendant, and the Defendant would return home to Korea, and the Defendant would be called as “I am home”, “I am kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn', and kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn't

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of tear teared working clothes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Standard for the sentencing of the reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act / [Punishment] The scope of the obstruction of performance of official duties / [the scope of the recommended sentence] the basic area of the sentence (referring to six months to one year and four months), there is no same power to decide the sentence, taking into account all other factors of the sentencing as well as all other factors of the sentencing, and there is no previous conviction since 2004, and there is no need for strict protection of the law recognizing the crime.