손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The parties' assertion
A. On the grounds delineated below the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Defendant completed the transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant with respect to the Posp D vehicles owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant vehicle”), and completed the transfer of ownership by selling the said vehicle to a third party constitutes a tort, and thus, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the amount equivalent to KRW 6,00,000,000, which is the market price of the said vehicle, as compensation for damages caused by a tort.
(1) Around November 2013, when the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the E Hospital located in the Namnam-gun, Namnam-gun, the Plaintiff prepared and delivered a power of attorney to the Plaintiff’s birth, excluding the Plaintiff’s consignment column, and did not delegate the sale or transfer of the instant vehicle to C or the Plaintiff. Although the Defendant, at the Plaintiff’s name, affixed the seals of the Plaintiff’s name and telephone number on the side of the Plaintiff’s name stated in the delegation column, the Plaintiff’s agent’s name and telephone number on the part of the Plaintiff’s wife, the agent’s name and telephone number on the part of the Plaintiff’s wife, “vehicle and its exclusive use” on the part of the agent column, “a 10” on the part of the delegation column, and “a 10” on the part of the issuance column, and the Defendant completed the transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant with a certificate of personal seal impression issued by the Plaintiff with the above forged power of attorney.
(2) Even if the Plaintiff prepared and delivered to C a proxy form for the renewal of the seal imprint and the issuance of a certificate of seal imprint, which made the mandatory to C, “C”, “vehicle scrapping and transfer”, this is not for the temporary transfer of the name of the vehicle and for the sale of the vehicle.
Nevertheless, the Plaintiff was unable to return the said vehicle by selling the said vehicle to a third party after the Defendant completed the registration of transfer of ownership in its name.