When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 12:00 on July 17, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would work as an employee in the instant dan in the victim C’s performance bar in the Jeju Do Do Do Do 2,200,000 won.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to work as an employee even if he received the advance payment from the injured party.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was given 2.2 million won as the name of the victim in advance from the place of the damage.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the loan certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment concerning facts constituting a crime: Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: It shall be decided as per the Disposition for not less than Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;