노동조합및노동관계조정법위반
A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is the same person as E of the representative director of the (ju) D in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon. The defendant is the employer who works as a regular business in the above company and is in charge of the taxiing of workers, the change of workers' form of work and the handling
( state)D is engaged in taxi transport business with 64 full-time workers, and the company has three trade unions, such as the South-Naming Association of the Korean Air Industry Workers' Union under the Korean Labor-General, the Chungcheong Regional Trade Union D Branch under the Democratic Labor-General, and the Jeju Regional Trade Union.
( state) On July 28, 2011, D Trade Union demanded the above Company to negotiate with the wage agreement in 2011 and began from July 29, 201 to proceed with the procedures for the simplification of bargaining windows of three trade unions located in the above Company from July 29, 2011.
The Defendant, the employer of the above company, was scheduled to conclude collective bargaining with the labor union to which a majority of the workers belong, among the “The Korea Military Industry Union Do Branch” and “the Do Branch Association of the Chungcheongnam-nam Regional Trade Union.”
No employer shall control or intervene in the organization or operation of a trade union by workers.
Nevertheless, the Defendant committed this part of the facts charged around August 1, 201, is a selective public prosecution of “the date of the crime committed on August 1, 2011 or August 6, 2011,” and the filing date of the request for negotiation by the ASEAN branch of the National Taxi Industry Trade Union is August 5, 2011, and the witness G statements that it is the date of August 1, 201, and that it is recognized as August 1, 201.
At the same time within the above company, G workers of the above company that had dialogueed with F by the chairperson of the "Woo-nam Association of the Korea Taxi Industry Workers' Union" was called "F," and recommended G workers to join the "Woo-nam Association of the Korea Taxi Industry Workers' Union" and provided G with convenience for taxi vehicles.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of the witness H, I, J, G, and F;
1.I, G, and F.