건물인도
The Defendant, as the Plaintiff
A. Of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, the number of real estate indicated in the separate sheet No. 2(a), (b), (c), (d), and (a) respectively.
① On May 31, 2019, the Plaintiff: (a) indicated in the separate sheet No. 2, 2019, indicated in the separate sheet No. 2, b, c, d, and 50,000 square meters (hereinafter “instant store”); (b) indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, which is owned by the Plaintiff to the Defendant as to the lease deposit KRW 3 million; (c) monthly rent of KRW 450,000 (payment on June 15, 201); and (c) the lease term from June 15, 2019 to June 15, 2020 (hereinafter “instant lease”); (c) the Plaintiff delivered the instant store to the Defendant under the said contract; (c) there is no dispute between the parties to whom the instant lease was terminated; or may be recognized by comprehensively taking into account the purport of the entire pleadings and arguments No. 1,4,7-11.
According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant store to the Plaintiff upon the termination of the instant lease agreement to its original state, and to pay the Plaintiff the amount of unjust enrichment by the rate of KRW 450,000 per month from June 16, 2020 to the completion date of delivery of the instant store.
The plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.