2. In full view of all the circumstances following the crime, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, and thus, is deemed unreasonable, since it is not recognized that the sentence of the lower court is too too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant, even though it is considered that the victim does not want punishment by mutual consent with the victim; (b) the amount acquired by the Defendant was not specified; (c) the Defendant had the record of being sentenced to suspended sentence due to fraud around 199; and (d) the Defendant’s refusal to appear during the trial process of the lower court, such as the Defendant’s escape and refusal to appear.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.