2. Determination

A. In the lower court’s determination, the Defendant asserted the same purport as the grounds for appeal in this case. Under the title of “determination of innocence”, the lower court’s assertion in the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, ① the gist of the Defendant’s assertion in the complaint book of the relevant unclaimed case (i.e., “Defendant did not have consented to the resignation of the representative director,” and the victim, etc. forged the minutes containing the Defendant’s representative director resignation and new appointment of directors; thus, the gist of the Defendant’s assertion in the complaint book of this case (as of March 26, 2014, 200), is that “the victim and the Defendant agreed to resign from the representative director’s office, without consent to the resignation of the representative director’s office,” and that the Defendant’s assertion is deemed to have consented to resign from the board of directors’ meeting as a witness in the relevant unclaimed case, and that if each of the minutes was written, it would be identical to the Defendant’s consent to the resignation of the representative director’s office and the Defendant’s general meeting of 217.

Evidence 3, face value 44.