(a) A project approval and public notice - A public housing project (CB) - A public housing project (CB) - D publicly announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 26, 2010 - A project operator: The defendant;

(b) The adjudication of expropriation made by the Central Land Tribunal on November 19, 2015 - The land subject to expropriation by the Central Land Tribunal on November 19, 2015 - The land subject to expropriation by the Plaintiff: The land appraisal corporation, the land appraisal corporation, the land appraisal corporation, the land appraisal corporation, the land appraisal corporation, and the land appraisal corporation for dialogue (hereinafter referred to as “land appraisal”) by the Plaintiff on March 3, 2000, respectively, among the land of the same lot number 110.2 square meters of forest land owned by the Plaintiff, 7/10 of the same lot 110.2 square meters of forest land owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff B”) - Compensation for losses on January 12, 2016 - Compensation for losses on January 12, 2016 - Compensation for the Plaintiff 105,980,30 won of compensation for the Plaintiff, and compensation for the Plaintiff

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on August 25, 2016 - Contents of the ruling: The Plaintiff’s filing of an objection shall be dismissed; the Plaintiff’s compensation for the Plaintiff B shall be increased to KRW 463,016,400 - An appraisal corporation: AB certified public appraisal corporation; the Korea Appraisal Corporation; the Korea Appraisal Corporation; the Korea Appraisal Corporation; and the Pacific Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Objection Appraisal”).

D. Results of the appraisal commission to the appraiser G of this court - Contents of appraisal - The appraisal value of the Plaintiff’s land A is KRW 107,082,00,00, and the appraised value of the Plaintiff’s land B is KRW 461,630,00 (i.e., KRW 268,934,680, KRW 192,695,720), respectively (hereinafter “court appraisal”). The appraisal result of the above appraisal commission is without any dispute (hereinafter “court appraisal”). Facts that there is no dispute about the evidence No. 1-2, evidence No. 1-2, evidence No. 2, evidence No. 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, evidence No. 3-1, evidence No. 4-1, evidence No. 6, Eul’s evidence No. 4, and evidence No. 1 through No. 8 (including a number)

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the appraisal of expropriation and the appraisal of the objection regarding the plaintiffs' land is unfair because it is not reflected in the market price, and it is so low.