If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Defendant is a person entitled to a call for military force mobilization.

Therefore, upon receipt of the notice of call for military force mobilization, it should be enlisted at the designated date.

Nevertheless, on October 12, 2012, the Defendant received military force mobilization training conducted by registered mail from 407, Ansan-gu B and 407, November 12, 2012 to 14, 2012. Incheon. The Defendant, who received military force mobilization training under the name of the Commissioner of the Military Manpower Administration in the Gyeonggi-do District Military Manpower Administration, and avoided the call of mobilization training without justifiable grounds even after being served with the notice of military force mobilization training under the name of the Commissioner of the Military Manpower Administration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the list of callers for military force mobilization training;

1. Article 90 (1) of the relevant Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 90 (1) of the Military Service Act that selects Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;