When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around 02:50 on February 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) in front of Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul, “I will not cause a drunk customer”; (b) whether the slope affiliated with the D District of Mapo-gu Police Station D, dispatched upon receipt of a 112 report, would pay the Defendant a taxi fee and return home to the Defendant; and (c) whether the Defendant would have to do so.

I do not agree.

“Fresh and walking the right-side mouth of the above E, and the horse f when the horse f met it, the she sphere of the F, and the she sphere is sphere of the f;

kneeel kelelelel, police kneves, and clothes.

The term "I desire to be called, and continuously the quality of police officers to the end."

이에 피고인을 현행 범인으로 체포한 후 순찰차에 태우려고 하자 순찰차 조수석 뒷문을 발로 3회 가량 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the report case by a slope E and a Senior F, who is a police officer, and caused the utility of the patrol car, which is a building for public use by walking the back of the patrol car with walking the back of the patrol car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged by patrols;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 141 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the same Act;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment (in depth, it shall be taken into consideration that there is no past record of criminal punishment, except for those sentenced to a fine once, and that the damaged patrol vehicle has been restored to its original state, etc.);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;