도로교통법위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in the driver's duty of Obane.
On October 25, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of 0.060% of alcohol concentration in blood without obtaining a license for a motor device bicycle for light 18:50 on October 25, 2015, and the Defendant proceeded along two-lanes from the north-do Soon-si, Gyeonggi-do to the intersection of non-service distance in the middle of the Eup-do.
In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating steering steering devices, brakes, etc. and safely driving them.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving the part on the right side of the victim D(43 ) driving in the signal waiting in one lane of the running direction of the Defendant, and received the part on the left side side of the Defendant’s Otobba.
Ultimately, the Defendant caused the foregoing occupational negligence to damage the repairing cost to the extent of KRW 2,279,538, such as the start-up, etc. of a set-off driver after the car was set off.
2. On October 25, 2015, the Defendant driven a croto, while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.060%, without obtaining a motor device license from around 5km to the unservice distance intersection located in the Eup located in the Eup/Myeon located in the 18:50 Sincheon-si, Seocheon-do, Seocheon-do, Gyeonggi-do, to the non-service distance intersection located in the Eup/Myeon located in the 2km of Gyeonggi-do.
3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a person who has an objection to C.
No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.
The Defendant driven the above Oba, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (2).
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's statement in court;