2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant's mistake is recognized and reflected, and the crimes of paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6-A, 6-b, 7 of the crime of the 2017 Highest 282 Highest 2017 Highest 202 Highest 282 Highest 3,4, 6-A, 6-b, 77 of the crime of the 4nd 1 through 4, 2017 Highest 670 of the crime of the 2017 Highest 670 in the crime of the 2017 Highest 670 shall be considered at the same time in relation to habitual fraud, etc. of the criminal records as indicated in the judgment of the court below, and the facts that the defendant's words by theft are complaining of the defendant's wife, and the defendant's efforts

However, the crime of this case was committed in the form of a speech that the defendant does not reside in the Republic of Korea, by forging various private documents and signature, and by using the resident registration certificate, and by deceiving the living benefits and the basic pension, which is very poor in the nature of the crime. The crime of this case was committed repeatedly over a long time, and the crime of this case was sentenced to suspension of execution under the name of the defendant, and was committed for habitual larceny and habitual fraud such as purchasing goods by using a credit card issued under another person's name, and was sentenced to suspension of execution, and even thereafter, there is a high possibility to criticize the crime of this case.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, health status, motive and consequence of the crime, and all other sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair as it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.