A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

except that from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On December 26, 2016, at the G convenience store operated by the Victim F, in Busan, Busan, on the part of the victim F, about 08:00, the Defendants: (a) purchased the World Cup chip; and (b) the victims of the defect seeking to purchase the beer additionally did not drinking within the store; (c) Defendant A expressed the victim’s desire to “Chob hyp” as it was calculated by the victim; and (d) sought the content of the World Cup container used by his hand; and (e) Defendant B tried to leave the contents to the victim; and (e) Defendant B said the victim “hyp hyp hyp hyp hyp” to the victim.

“The expression was expressed as “...”

The Defendants continued to have been able to avoid a disturbance for about 10 minutes, such as making the victim take a large bath, forcing 2 female customers who were in the place to drink alcohol.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's convenience store operation by force.

2. The Defendants who interfered with the performance of official duties at the above date, time, place, and the above 112 reported by the Defendants that they were suffering from disturbance at the convenience store, and recommended the Defendants to return home after the Defendants, a police officer belonging to the Busan High Police Station H District, who called the Busan High Police Station H District, to leave the above convenience store, and to board the patrol vehicle, and Defendant B, who collected the wheel on the front wheel of the patrol vehicle, stated that “A h and h k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k.

Accordingly, around 08:22 on the same day, the defendants were trying to arrest the defendants from the patrol car as the current criminal of interference with the performance of official duties, and the defendant A tried to arrest the defendants as the defendants. The defendant stated that "I would have been erroneous in the frib head head fri head fri head fri head fri head fri head fri head fri head fri head fri head fri head fri head frik, and the defendant B added I arms so that I would not put the defendants on the part of the defendant A.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit the crimes of police officers.