beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.14 2017나68349

부당이득금

Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The basic facts of the claim (1) The Plaintiff is a mobile phone manufacturer and distributor, and the Defendant is a gold-making company.

(2) On January 8, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant on the following terms and conditions (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the effect that 200 of the Aluminium portion (5 pin, 8 pinine, 30 pinine), which is necessary for the manufacture of a chargeer for smartphone, is to be produced and supplied by the Defendant, and 200 of the sample sample of the Aluminium portion produced using a simple gold type (hereinafter “instant contract”) and paid 10 million won to the Defendant on January 8, 2015, and 333 million won on February 26, 2015, respectively: < Amended by Act No. 13190, Jan. 8, 2015; Act No. 13190, Feb. 26, 2015>

(13) Total sum of 130,000 130,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 U.S.-1 25,000 260 250,000 11,200 50 PIN (MAL CAS CAS 1) 1,350 1,350 120 1,50 650 1350 6,00 120 6,00 120 6,00 6,000 U.S.C. 290 2,00

Article III Contract Period and (A) Contract Period: This Agreement from 09 October 2015 to 30 May 2015.

(B) The due date of sampling: 31 January 2015.